Three poems

February – Not Everywhere

Such days, when trees run downwind,
their arms stretched before them.

Such days, when the sun’s in a drawer
and the drawer is locked.

When the meadow is dead, is a carpet
thin and shabby, with no pattern

and at bus stops people retract into collars
their faces like fists.

- And when, in a firelit room, a mother looks
at her four seasons, her little boy,

in the centre of everything, with still pools
of shadows and a fire throwing flowers.

Norman MacCaig

*

Gigha

That firewood pale with salt and burning green
Outfloats its men who waved with a sound of drowning
Their saltcut hands over mazes of this rough bay.

Quietly this morning beside the subsided herds
Of water I walk. The children wade the shallows.
The sun with long legs wades into the sea.

 

W.S. Graham

*

Sunday Night

Make use of the things around you.

This light rain

outside the window, for one.

This cigarette between my fingers.

These feet on the couch.

The faint sound of rock-and-roll.

The red Ferrari in my head.

The woman bumping

drunkenly around in the kitchen .

Put it all in.

Make use.

Raymond Carver

Featured Poet: James Wright

Lying in a Hammock at William Duffy’s Farm in Pine Island, Minnesota

Lying in a Hammock at William Duffy’s Farm in Pine Island, Minnesota

Over my head, I see the bronze butterfly,

Asleep on the black trunk,

Blowing like a leaf in green shadow.

Down the ravine behind the empty house,

The cowbells follow one another

Into the distances of the afternoon.

To my right,

In a field of sunlight between two pines,

The droppings of last year’s horses

Blaze up into golden stones.

I lean back, as the evening darkens and comes on.

A chicken hawk floats over, looking for home.

I have wasted my life.

James Wright

Featured Artist: Salvador Dali

“Butterflies”

“Elephants”

“Woman at the Window”

*

I’m sure Dali needs no introduction. This post is mostly for myself as he’s one of my all time favourite artists.

Studying (hah!), etc

This is a perfunctory post to make up for the extended inactivity on the blog, one I’m afraid will ensue for at least a fortnight more. I’m currently on my study holidays, which is so laughably ironic. “Studying” is the last thing I’m upto, though over the last couple of days my guilt almost succeeded in overcoming my, well, what seems my resolve to leave college books, literature texts I’m supposed to pore over, print-outs of Psychology related paraphernalia I wonder when I’ll start mugging, boring Media Laws awaiting more mugging, profiles, (some relief) movie and book reviews, untouched. Almost.

What I have been doing is the usual. Watching movies and reading more books with the occasional digression of falling suddenly, violently ill and then recovering just as abruptly. But I did (joyously) shop for books! Nice collect this time. Bought more Terry Pratchett – The Fifth Elephant which I’m already done gobbling. Don’t you simply love Sam Vimes? And more  of Carrot and Angua chemistry (That does sound crass, doesn’t it? Heehee), if you can call the weird Terry Pratchett romance romance.

Also purchased Jeanette Winterson’s Boating for Beginners and The Passion. I’ve vowed  not to rest until my bookshelf is furnished with her complete works. I did surprise myself by buying Neil Gaiman’s American Gods, which I can’t wait to read now. Meanwhile I’ve had to content myself with opening the book randomly and sniffing at the new pages. Smell of brand new books!

What I did manage to read, and succeed in leaving myself stranded in, is Literary Occasions by VS Naipaul which, apart from being ever so slightly dry, is quite an interesting read. I did get to read the Nobel Lecture I’ve wanted to for a while now, but hadn’t been able to bring myself to strain my eyes on the online version which I’ve got stored away somewhere. But admittedly, it wasn’t as remarkable as I expected it to be. The essays aren’t written exclusively for the book, which is simply a collection of various essays by Naipaul amassed over the length of his literary career, forewords to many of his novels and some accessory writing.  So a lot of what appears in one tends to repeat in others, subtly rearranged. But the first essay “Reading and Writing” was worth the trouble.

The other book I’m bang in the middle of is The Routledge Creative Writing Coursebook. I tend to be apprehensive about borrowing How To books, especially where writing is concerned. But I thought I’d risk this one because it has dozens of writing suggestions and exercises some of which I might be persuaded to try over the end-semester holidays. Also, I was similarly distrustful of writing workshops earlier where I’ve happily been proven wrong. Moreover, the book illustrates each topic with the whole or extracts of some very good pieces of writing. I must make a note of them and look them up. Some more nice holiday reading (the others being The Magus by John Fowles and A Suitable Boy by Vikram Seth, plus American Gods).

Must run now. I have an exam tomorrow and should know better than to unashamedly blog at a time like this.

Meanwhile, here’s a wonderful poem, courtesy The Coursebook:

Sandra Lee Scheuer

(Killed at Kent State University, May 4, 1970 by the Ohio National Guard)

You might have met her on a Saturday night,
cutting precise circles, clockwise, at the Moon-Glo
Roller Rink, or walking with quick step

between the campus and a green two-storey house,
where the room was always tidy, the bed made,
the books in confraternity on the shelves.

She did not throw stones, major in philosophy
or set fire to buildings, though acquaintances say
she hated war, had heard of Cambodia.

In truth she wore a modicum of make-up, a brassiere,
and could no doubt more easily have married a guardsman
than cursed or put a flower in his rifle barrel.

While the armouries burned, she studied,
bent low over notes, speech therapy books, pages
open at sections on impairment, physiology.

And while they milled and shouted on the commons,
she helped a boy named Billy with his lisp, saying
Hiss, Billy, like a snake. That’s it, SSSSSSSS,

tongue well up and back behind your teeth.
Now buzz, Billy, like a bee. Feel the air
vibrating in my windpipe as I breathe?

As she walked in sunlight through the parking-lot
at noon, feeling the world a passing lovely place,
a young guardsman, who had his sights on her,

was going down on one knee, as if he might propose.
His declaration, unmistakable, articulate,
flowered within her, passed through her neck,

severed her trachea, taking her breath away.
Now who will burn the midnight oil for Billy,
ensure the perilous freedom of his speech;

and who will see her skating at the Moon-Glo
Roller Rink, the eight small wooden wheels
making their countless revolutions on the floor?

Gary Geddes

Featured Poet: Gillian Clarke

The Stone Hare

Think of it waiting three hundred million years,
not a hare hiding in the last stand of wheat,
but a premonition of stone, a moonlit reef
where corals reach for the light through clear
waters of warm Palaeozoic seas.
In its limbs lies the story of the earth,
the living ocean, then the slow birth
of limestone from the long trajectories
of starfish, feather stars, crinoids and crushed shells
that fill with calcite, harden, wait for the quarryman,
the timed explosion and the sculptor’s hand.
Then the hare, its eye a planet, springs from the chisel
to stand in the grass, moonlight’s muscle and bone,
the stems of sea lilies slowly turned to stone.

*

Where do poems come from? An architect sees an interior before he sees the building. Before roof and walls there is space and light. That’s how it feels when a poem is about to form: there is an idea, an image, a fuzzy line, a fizzing excitement, but the words have yet to speak. Even if there are words it is somehow too dark to read them, though a phrase or a line may be legible already. But as soon as this unclear vision declares its presence one can be certain that the poem can be written.

For me, the poem arrives in a coinciding moment of language and energy. Its subject is like a novelist’s plot – merely an excuse to rummage in the mind for language. There are few plots and writers share the same small store, using them over and over again. When a poem is on the way it feels as though energy has been lying in wait for language. Or is it the other way about? And whence does that language come flooding, as strongly as any of the driving human passions, and as suddenly, as mysteriously? The poem is begun in the moment of germination, though it must be unmade and made again in the cold light of the mind before it can be called a finished work of art. To have an idea for a poem is to have nothing at all.

Where do poems come from? An architect sees an interior before he sees the building. Before roof and walls there is space and light. That’s how it feels when a poem is about to form: there is an idea, an image, a fuzzy line, a fizzing excitement, but the words have yet to speak. Even if there are words it is somehow too dark to read them, though a phrase or a line may be legible already. But as soon as this unclear vision declares its presence one can be certain that the poem can be written.

For me, the poem arrives in a coinciding moment of language and energy. Its subject is like a novelist’s plot – merely an excuse to rummage in the mind for language. There are few plots and writers share the same small store, using them over and over again. When a poem is on the way it feels as though energy has been lying in wait for language. Or is it the other way about? And whence does that language come flooding, as strongly as any of the driving human passions, and as suddenly, as mysteriously? The poem is begun in the moment of germination, though it must be unmade and made again in the cold light of the mind before it can be called a finished work of art. To have an idea for a poem is to have nothing at all.

(At the Source, Gillian Clarke)

Featured Artist: Leonid Afrimov

Quiet Harbor by Leonid Afremov

Penelope Lively; Calvino

For the past couple of weeks I haven’t been reading as regularly as I would like to, partly due to college schedule, and tests. This week is going to be terrible because of all the assignments I’ve let assemble. I’d sworn that I’d get a start on them today, but, what the heck, I’m succumbing to the much stronger enticement of watching movies and catching up on my reading. And I don’t even regret. Meanwhile, here are some more of my bookish musings.

This morning I finished reading Making it Up by Penelope Lively, which I was awfully excited about when I first found it as the blurb touted that the book was positioned on an alternate universe structure, albeit a different one to that of those in the category similar to The Butterfly Effect and other such stories, because Lively had used her own life as a take-off point and written something of an alternate autobiography. She examines through the novel the life she might have led had she made different choices than the ones she had.

The effectiveness of such an exercise is debatable. Lively builds upon the stories using her real life as the base but moves in different trajectories than the ones that actually occurred, but, the readers who are unaware of the biographical details of her life will obviously find it puzzling when she begins each new chapter with something entirely out of the blue (like I did, not being a regular reader of  Lively and without any general interest in her personal life – in fact I hadn’t even heard of her before I found this book; but that just points at my own ignorance, does it?) which she alone recognizes as a   breaking away from the sequence of factual events, but which the readers cannot understand completely until the end of the chapter where Lively has inserted a note on why and how these particular characters were born and what unmade choices motivate their lives.

The book is called a “novel”, a term whose accuracy in defining what the book actually is I’m definitely beginning to doubt. Each chapter unveils with an ensemble of characters wholly diverse from the ones in the previous or the later ones. I was wondering what Lively may have wanted to articulate through this peculiar construction. That you and I will not be the same persons we are now if we had followed other paths, but entirely different characters, so discordant as to merit new names and new histories? Granted, maybe, but the novel was still too disconnected for me. (Or is it me who’s stagnating as a reader, with stultified views on what constitutes a novel?)

Well, I’m not convinced. The alternate universe framework of the “novel” still seems a very clever camouflage for what is actually a collection of short stories. Whichever, the book certainly lacked energy and does not deserve a thorough read (least of all a second one).

I do love the idea of “confabulation” as a literary device, though. Penelope Lively writes in the preface to the book:

This book is fiction. If anything, it is an anti-memoir. My own life serves as a prompt; I have homed in upon the rocks, the rapids, the whirlpools, and written the alternative stories. It is a form of confabulation. That word has a precise meaning: in psychiatric terminology, it refers to the creation of imaginary remembered experiences which replace the gaps left by disorders of the memory. My memory is not yet disordered; this exercise in confabulation is a piece of fictional license.

*

I also found Italo Calvino’s If on a Winter’s Night a Traveler (I love the title, by the way) in the college library today. I’ve already read parts of the first few chapters of the book — sometime last year, I think. I hate it when I’ve read a little of a book before and have to go back and read the whole thing again because, otherwise, I won’t fully understand what’s happening.  So I was slightly anxious when I began afresh, constantly looking to see if there were things I recalled from my last reading. I’ve retained a sense of what happens in the beginning of the book, because of its uniqueness. Fortunately I seem to have forgotten the details.

Here’s a teaser:

In his arms he has a pile of galleys; he sets them down gently, as if the slightest jolt could upset the order of the printed letters. “A publishing house is a fragile organism, dear sir,” he says. “If at any point something goes askew, then the disorder spreads, chaos opens beneath our feet. Forgive me, won’t you? When I think about it I have an attack of vertigo.” And he covers his eyes, as if pursued by the sight of billions of pages, lines, words, whirling in a dust storm.

Can’t wait to properly immerse myself in this book; but first I have to finish whatever else I’ve left languishing among the other library books. Hmph.

Library Books

New hoard from library:

1. The Invention of Everything Else, Samantha Hunt

2. Alice in Sunderland, Bryan Talbot

3. Making It Up, Penelope Lively

4. 1984, George Orwell

5. Real Voices on Reading, Edited by Philip Davis

6. Granta 102: The New Nature Writing

Library books always get me excited. I don’t really know how to explain the phenomenon of bringing home a lot of library books and having my reading for about a month settled. I think it’s something about BOOKS! in addition to the fact that they are in such large number. Never fails to bring smiles to my face.

This sort of sums up the way I feel about them. (I wrote this quite a while ago, as part of a Facebook meme):

I go crazy when I buy new books. Or even borrow books from library. The criteria for eccentricity are (very spare, actually): books must come in large numbers, and they must be unread.

After I get them home I sit on the bed, remove the books from bag and spread them all around me. I let the feeling of unread-new-bookness seep into me, and think: “Oh my god! I have so many new books to read!”

It takes a while for the initial euphoria to recede. Then comes the hard part: Which book do I read first?

Usually, I end up reading three to four books at the same time.

I have a unique way (unique, as far as I’m aware) of selecting books in a library; to say the process is an extremely convoluted one would not be an exaggeration. This process is exacerbated when said library allows a lot of books to be borrowed. The selection occurs in the following (non-rigid) steps:

1. Return previously borrowed books, and do a bit of aimless wandering around in the library taking in the sight of tall, long shelves of books and books and books; soaking up the library atmosphere.
2. Despair a bit that the collection is not good enough, that I’ll never be able to find satisfying books to read, maybe one or two, but definitely not five.
3. Then do a bit of more specific wandering fingering spines of books which have the potential to be borrowed.
4. Pull out book from shelf, look at book cover, author, title, blurb, synopsis, reviews and first page or some random page in middle to sample language (in this order) and put it back or retain it if (I decide the book is) bad or good respectively.
5. I don’t restrict myself in the selection process; I pull out as many books as whim dictates, and keep as many books as I want to regardless of how many books are allowed according to my membership. (I have the one which allows most, obviously) Because this is just the shortlist, see?
6. Of course, doesn’t take a genius to figure out that I’ll be loaded with more books than I can possibly borrow even in, say, five-to-six visits put together. I arrange all the books as neatly as I can on a clear space at the nearest shelf and lifting them up, bending under their weight, really, I walk to the rest of the leftover shelves which I haven’t scoured for books yet.
7. When I’m done hunting for good books, I hurry to the nearest reading table with a tottering pile of books – a dangerously swaying tower of wonderful books – and land them on the flat surface with a thump.
8. I sit down and begin sorting them into two piles – one which I want to borrow and the other which I can afford to postpone the reading of until another visit. After a lot of scratching of head, agonizing over book-titles, and despair (a different kind which mourns my inability to borrow all these books at once), I come up with the final assortment.
9. Then before I can change my mind again, before the insurgence of gnawing thoughts that I should have selected some other book instead of that one I reach the counter, get my books sealed and burst into the heady sunlight outside the library.

*

I selected The Invention of Everything Else, firstly because of the enchanting cover, and because of the brilliant title, which is a sort of play on a quote, the epigraph, by Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Patent Office, 1899, “Everything that can be invented has been invented” (rubbish, really) which is so stunning.

I only later realized that the book is the fictionalization of the life story of the scientist Nikola Tesla. Which I thought boring, but only fleetingly, as the language already had me in its grip.

Here’s the opening paragraph:

Lightning first, then thunder. And in between the two I’m reminded of a secret. I was a boy and there was a storm. The storm said something muffled. Try and catch me, perhaps, and then it bent down close to my ear in the very same way my brother Dane used to do. Whispering. A hot, damp breath, a tunnel between his mouth and my ear. The storm began to speak. You want to know what the storm said? Listen.

The library also had a graphic novel exhibition for about a fortnight which had concluded a day before my visit, which I was unaware of as everything else not within 5 meters radius of me; but it wasn’t a complete fiasco, as the books previously on display were now being lent.  I haven’t really read any graphic novels but have always wanted to; especially Neil Gaiman’s the Sandman series. So when my eyes fell on the word Sandman embossed in large shiny letters across the face of a large shiny book, I was overjoyed; but this joy was short lived. The only ones available were volume 8 and 9. I don’t know whether they have the first few ones. Should have checked in the catalogue, foolish me. But they will, most probably; they can’t buy the last books of a series without buying the first can they? But now I’ll have to reserve the first if I have to have any chance of getting my hands on it. *Makes face*

But I did find this book called Alice in Sunderland, which I thought very tacky at first. It’s a big book, the size of a big magazine at the most, not like the smaller, handier formats novels are usually available in. But it’s all gloss , around three hundred pages of technicolour gloss, which also smells heavenly – smell of new books plus smell of new glossy paper. Can’t wait to read it, but saving it up for last.

And Penelope Lively’s Making It Up. How could I not pick it up after reading this on the inside flap? And, alternate universe narratives have always fascinated me.

Story-telling is an ingrained habit; I wouldn’t know what else to do. But the mythology that is intriguing today is that of imagined alternatives. Somehow, choice and contingency have landed you where you are, as the person that you are, and the whole process surely seems so precarious that you look back at those climactic moments when things might have gone differently, when life might have spun off in some other direction, and wonder at this apparently arbitrary outcome.

I’m not much of a reader of literary magazines except those available online. So I was hesitant while picking up Granta 102. And I don’t really like nature writing, or didn’t, as my conception of “nature writing” was, as Jason Cowley puts it in the Editor’s Letter,  “old nature writing – by which I mean the lyrical pastoral tradition of the romantic wanderer”. But Granta 102, he continues, and all new nature writing endeavours to establish a reconnection between man and nature; the separation being the primary reason for global natural disasters. Lydia Peele, one of the authors says, “…it is the tradition of the false notion of separation that has caused us so many problems and led to much environmental degradation. I believe that it is our great challenge in the twenty-first century to remake the connection. I think our lives depend on it.”

The first essay by Anthony Doerr really wowed me. In “Butterflies on a Wheel” Anthony Doerr writes about his experience on one particular drive across the stretch between Idaho and Ohio.

It was on such a drive that I encountered one of the most marvelous things I’ve ever seen. I was crossing the western half of Wyoming, my car shuddering in a crosswind, big rafts of cumuli cruising above the highway. Everything seemed stripped clean by wind and light. There was hardly any traffic, only a long-hauler now and then. Up ahead the air grew abruptly darker, a thick band of grey, as if a long, opaque ribbon was being pulled along above the road. Within a few seconds, butterflies were exploding across the windshield. The air was thick with them: they cartwheeled over the hood; pieces of their wings lodged and vibrated in the wipers. For maybe a minute, at sixty then fifty then forty miles an hour, this kept up, thousands of butterflies breaking over the front of my Subaru. Sometimes their bodies seemed to simply pulverize – as if there were no liquid element to the creatures at all, just a wash of grey powder across the glass.

[…]

Salmon, wildebeest, locusts. Storks, swifts, snow geese. What if the torrents of animals migrating past us every year left behind traces of their routes? What if Arctic terns sketched lines through the sky as they poured out of Antarctica and back; what if steelhead trout left thin, colourful filaments behind as they muscled up our rivers? The skies above our fields would become a loom; the continents would be bundled in thread.

*sigh*

That’s sheer poetry, that is.

(Mental note – find more stuff by Anthony Doerr)

The graphic story by David Heatley was brilliantly done as well. Titled “Classic Combo” (#3 Combo – $6.95), the story subtly shows how much effort and destruction of nature and manual labour goes into preparing something as – apparently – simple as a fast food combination of a burger, a glass of chilled coke and a bottle of ketchup. His approach to the story is a sort of a glacier metaphor. The plate of food is only the tip of the glacier – reality buried in the humungous belly underneath water. But he begins from the bottom and traces the story to the tip to spectacular effect. You are left to gasp, or at the very least, with eyebrows disappearing in hair.

An excerpt:

From here.

Granta also has a lovely poem Elegy by Sean O’Brien. These lines, I think, are beautiful:

“As though the sea itself must satisfy

A final test before the long detention ends

And you can let the backwash take you out.

The tall green waves have waited in the bay

Since first you saw water as a child,”

[…]

“Here in the flat your boxed-up books and ornaments

Forget themselves, as you did in the end.”

Is that brilliant or what?

Books and Cover Art

Recently, a friend asked me whether I judge a book by its cover. And my answer? Yes, definitely. The cover of a book plays an extremely important role in my choice of a book, whether it’s for reading (from a library), or for buying. But my preferences are not so rigid  concerning books I’m merely borrowing as opposed to spending a lot of money on buying  – all investments, I tell myself. My mother of course, has huge problems. She cannot, for the life of her, understand why I torture myself to save up money merely to buy books, when I could be buying pretty dresses and matching jewels. But I guess she has reconciled herself to the fact at long last, or at least, given me up as a lost cause, and stopped bothering me.

But I don’t really buy books as often as I make it sound I do, and as often as I’d like to, if I’m honest. Most of the books I read come from the lot of libraries I’m a member of. I’m not complaining. There are a lot of good things about being a member of (many) libraries. You can borrow and read a lot of books, at a very affordable rate, for one. The advantage is not only in the number of books you have access to, but also the diversity. You find books you normally wouldn’t come across at an average bookshop, and sometimes, ones you wouldn’t find at a brilliant bookshop as well. The libraries I’ve loved also have a very comfortable atmosphere, they make you want to read (which is more than can be said about the library at college).

And no, I don’t really expect the books I borrow from the library to all be in good condition and have spellbinding cover art; to be so demanding is obviously foolish. But the books I buy should not only be adorned with excellent cover art, but should also be made of very high-quality paper, and have lovely font; not jarring, ornate font, but the nice-conventional kind.

When I say “good cover art” I don’t only mean ones which are skillfully designed, painted, etc, the phrase also extends to include good photography. In fact a lot of my favourite examples for good cover “art” are eye-catching photographs.

But there are definitely more instances where the author/storyline/style of writing scores over other books with great cover art. Of course, it goes without saying, the sum of parts should converge into a very powerful whole to appeal. All this because, for me, books are collectibles and reminders of a great many hours of enjoyable reading plus  a celebration of exceptional writing. As Jonathan Gibbs says in the Independent, books are (to a certain kind of reader) “beautiful, covetable, keep-able” objects.

“Covetable”  -  exactly.

Here’s an extract from the article in the Independent where Jonathan Gibbs writes about cover art:

“Wherever you stand on the future of the book – doomed to oblivion by the Kindle, or an indestructible part of our cultural life – there’s no doubt that recent years have seen a golden age of book design. There are of course whole bookshop shelves full of cheap, dull, generic products, but for those who know where to look, books have rarely been more interesting to look at, hold and open.

Partly this is a case of big publishers relying on brilliant design to make their goods stand out in an increasingly difficult market; but partly, too, it’s a case of small, independent publishers springing up to provide a certain kind of reader with what they want, more than ever: the book as beautiful, covetable, keep-able object.

You could argue that the current renaissance in book design came about thanks to Penguin, always the most design-savvy of publishers. In 2004 they produced their first series of Great Ideas – small paperback editions of classic, mostly philosophical texts. They had highly tactile covers and used bold period typography to give a sense of when and where each book was coming from. The following year we got Penguin by Design, an illustrated history of 70 years of Penguin covers, and then, in 2007, Seven Hundred Penguins, a two-inch-thick collection of the best covers, shown life-size, one to a page. For seasoned haunters of second-hand bookshops, this particular item was as thrilling as a similar-sized brick of Class A drugs.

[…]

It’s no surprise that good book design often comes with reissues, not least of classics. After all, anything out of copyright leaves more money for the presentation. Persephone Books, Hesperus Press, Pushkin Press and Capuchin Classics are four British independent publishers that specialise in bringing back into print often long-neglected works, helped along by some beautiful design. Persephone are distinctive for their uniform grey jackets – it’s only when you open them that you find the bright-coloured endpapers, sourced from fabrics dating from the time of the book’s setting or writing.”

Read the rest of the article here.

I was first prompted to write something about cover art by a feature The Sunday Herald (the Sunday supplement of Deccan Herald, Bangalore, and not, as the newspaper’s website proclaims, Scotland’s award-winning independent newspaper) ran a couple of months ago.

It spoke about how cover art has now transformed from being only promotion-oriented into a sort of artistic genre in itself. A pretty good article from what I remember of it; got me thinking about all the books I’d judged by the cover. Unfortunately I’ve lost the link, and I’m finding it really hard to trace its origin online – Deccan Herald’s website is very difficult to navigate through and they also have a useless search engine.

Here are some book covers I love:

Featured Poem: Fiesta Melons

Fiesta Melons

In Benidorm there are melons,

Whole donkey-carts full

Of innumerable melons,

Ovals and balls,

Bright green and thumpable

Laced over with stripes

Of turtle-dark green.

Choose an egg-shape, a world-shape,

Bowl one homeward to taste

In the whitehot noon:

Cream-smooth honeydews,

Pink-pulped whoppers,

Bump-rinded cantaloupes

With orange cores.

46

‘956

Each wedge wears a studding

Of blanched seeds or black seeds

To strew like confetti

Under the feet of

This market of melon-eating

Fiesta-goers

In Benidorm there are melons,

Whole donkey-carts full

Of innumerable melons,

Ovals and balls,

Bright green and thumpable

Laced over with stripes

Of turtle-dark green.

Choose an egg-shape, a world-shape,

Bowl one homeward to taste

In the whitehot noon:

Cream-smooth honeydews,

Pink-pulped whoppers,

Bump-rinded cantaloupes

With orange cores.

Each wedge wears a studding

Of blanched seeds or black seeds

To strew like confetti

Under the feet of

This market of melon-eating

Fiesta-goers.

Sylvia Plath